Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Journal Entry 8 - posted 7/5/16 @ 2:20pm

Journal Entry #8
Assessment
Christy Dixon

Describe

Chapter 13 of Slavin’s book, Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice, discusses various ways to properly assess (or evaluate) student learning. This chapter also discusses the reasons behind assessments and why they are so important.

Before a teacher can assess for knowledge gained on a new concept, the teacher must first teach the new concept to the students. Teachers must carefully plan engaging lessons, all the while having the end in mind. One of the first things a teacher must decide is, what is it that I want the students to be able to do by the end of this lesson. This is called the objective. It’s important to make sure the objective you chose is in alignment with the assessment you will be giving. Another words, you can’t assess a student on long division, if your lesson leading up to the assessment was on addition. One way to plan effective lessons is by using the backward planning approach. This is when you “start by writing broad objectives for the course as a whole, then objectives for large units, and lastly specific behavioral objectives.” Slavin R.E. (2012). After doing this you can plan your lessons based on the specific objectives (goals).   

When it comes to assessments, there are basically two different types. One type of assessment is the summative assessment. This type of assessment is usually given at the end of a unit to evaluate the overall knowledge gained during the unit. This type of assessment, includes chapter tests and end of year assessments (like GA Milestone). Summative assessments allow teachers and other school officials to rank individual students relative to a larger group of their peers.

Formative assessments are given more often than summative assessments. Formative assessments are usually given all throughout the unit and they allow teachers to check for understanding and progress. Formative assessments can come in many forms such as assignments, quizzes, activities, oral questioning/discussion, observation and even hand signals (like a thumbs up or thumbs down). This type of assessment is very important for teachers. These are the type of assessments where the data gained from them can allow the teacher to see who understands and who may need more help. Data from formative assessments can help guide teachers in the planning future lessons and deciding on proper differentiation to meet the need of their students.

When creating assessments (whether formative or summative) it’s important that the assessments are created properly. Teachers can use selective response, constructive response and they can even include writing tasks in their assessments. Many times (especially with summative assessments) it’s good to include a mixture of these types of questions. One way to insure that you do so, is by using a table of specifications. This allows the teacher to see what Blooms level each assessment question is along with the topic of each question.

As I mentioned earlier, there are more ways to assess students’ knowledge than just chapter test and quizzes. Teacher may choose to use portfolio or performance assessments. These “require students to demonstrate their learning through work samples or direct real-world applications.” Slavin R.E. (2012). These types of assessments are usually scored with the use of detailed rubrics.

Analyze

Over all, I found this chapter to be quite interesting. I remember back when I was young, the main focus (when it came to assessments) was on chapter tests and quizzes. I feel many of my teachers only focused on these types of summative grades. However, there is a problem with that. If teachers only focus on the summative grades, by the time they bring up their concern about the grade, it’s too late. The teacher has moved on to a new concept. Using formative assessment allows teachers to stop the struggling student before it’s too late. Or as Slavin stated, “make midcourse corrections in pace or content of instruction.” Slavin R.E. (2012).  For formative assessments to be effective as possible, they need to be “closely tied to the curriculum being taught, timely and frequent.” Slavin R.E. (2012).  
During my groups discussion on formative assessments, Daphene suggested wonderful idea. She said that we can use formative assessments to teach students how to assess themselves. “The students can contribute to the learning environment and come up with some self-assessment strategies to help them better understand their own thought process (meta-cognition).” This is such a great idea.

Reflect

How do you feel about this concept?
I feel very strongly about the use of assessments. I use assessments daily with my students. When done properly, assessments provide teachers, students and parents with valuable feedback.  

What did you learn about this concept that you did not know prior to its presentation?
I had never heard of a table of specifications before. I like the idea though. It gives me the ability to see exactly what is on the test and insures that my students have different Bloom’s taxonomy level questions. 

How might you handle a situation or activity differently based on this learned information?
I will start incorporating a table of specifications when building my assessments. This way I can make sure that I am creating a balanced assessment (not too hard, not too easy).

How did this event change or confirm your knowledge or beliefs about teaching?
This chapter confirmed my belief in the importance of assessments (both formative or summative). They are beneficial in so many ways if created and used properly. The data gained from these assessments can guide future instruction that can better benefit the student.

Works Cited
Slavin, R.E. (2012) Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (10th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson

Class Discussion Week 9 

No comments:

Post a Comment